Data is everywhere on today’s factory production lines – but all too often its use is restricted to detecting poor-quality products that need to be rejected or reworked. And, even if any of the data collected is shared, it is likely to be limited to information such as whether a unit is running correctly or there are any signs of a fault.
Yet data gathered from end-of-line inspection technology on food and beverage production lines can tell a valuable story – yielding real-time insights into production that can be used to optimise processes to increase efficiency and reduce costs. The dramatic decrease in the costs associated with data collection, storage and analysis – as well as tools such as machine learning – mean this ‘fast-moving’ data can now be captured and analysed like never before.
Measurements from a checkweigher, for example, can flag up issues before they bring production to a halt. If four filling machines are involved in producing bags of rice and one of them develops a fault that leads to overweight bags, high-level data might not suggest a problem if the batch averages across the four machines are within the accepted range. It is only when the individual weights are analysed that a pattern emerges – allowing the issue to be identified and resolved.
Similarly, if the flow rate of a chocolate enrober coating multiple lanes of chocolate bars is uneven across the conveyor belt, data at a batch level will not flag up the real problem. Without the insights from data on individual weights, the enrober will be adjusted to ensure all bars meet the required weight. But if the flow is uneven, this will mean some of the bars receive an extra-thick layer of chocolate – increasing costs compared with running the equipment at the optimal level.
Linking equipment data can also reveal useful information. If a weigh price labeller is linked to a vision system designed to ensure labels are properly applied, analysis of the contrast of the print on the label can provide an early warning that the print head is failing. This means preventative maintenance can be carried out to avoid an unplanned stoppage if the print quality falls below the required standard – something that is particularly crucial if the label includes key allergen information.
X-ray inspection systems, at their most basic level, detect foreign objects such as metal, stone or glass contaminants. However, the X-ray image can also be used to verify the integrity of a product. As with the checkweigher, reject periodicity can indicate an issue with upstream equipment. But X-ray inspection can probe deeper into the specific issue. Take, for example, a four-pack of dessert pots. If one of the filler valves has become partially blocked, one of the four pots will be repeatedly underfilled. This underfill may not be sufficient for a checkweigher to identify the overall product as being underweight. But, by measuring the mass of each pot individually using X-ray zoned mass inspection, the four individual masses can be reported to the supervisory system and any deviations from the production norms can be identified rapidly.
In a connected environment, the frequency of breakages in products such as boxes of biscuits can also be monitored and flagged up, with warning thresholds set lower than automatic reject thresholds. If a misaligned tool is causing a high proportion of biscuits to be broken when placed into the packaging, data from X-ray inspection technology can highlight the issue before customer complaints start flooding in.
The latest X-ray inspection technology can also be used to check that the correct number of items are in a container. This, combined with a checkweigher, ensures the correct package weight is maintained, and the product is supplied as expected. The technology can also highlight the average size distribution of a product.
With a pack of four mangoes, for example, the total weight and the total number of mangoes is controlled, and any packs found to be non-conformant are rejected. But a pack containing three small and one large mango, while acceptable, is not as desirable as four similarly sized mangoes. Therefore, the size of each mango can be recorded by the X-ray system, and this can be made available for analysis, even if the data is not itself used to make a rejection decision. It may be decided at a later date that, in fact, this should be made a criterion for rejection – at which point historic data is available to allow a data-driven decision to be made regarding acceptable tolerances.
Traceability is another key issue where reliable data is vital. If, for example, there is an increase in the rate of bone contamination in packs of chicken breast fillets, it can be difficult to determine which supplier provided the non-conformant material – until now, this has been a largely manual, time-consuming process. If, however, the details of each unique inspection are automatically fed back to a central database which already has information on which starting batch was used and which intermediate equipment the product had passed through, it is much easier to determine how and why issues have arisen.
As the quantity of data increases, so does the value of combining data from a variety of sources. Does the operation of one piece of equipment affect the behaviour of a neighbouring machine, for example, leading to a nonconformant product? By bringing a broad range of data into a single location, in real time, temporal and environmental factors can be more easily correlated with issues. And this interconnected data can be harnessed to reveal unprecedented hidden value in the production line.
Bio
Dr Richard Parmee is founder and CEO of X-ray inspection technology pioneer Sapphire Inspection Systems. As well as designing bespoke solutions, Richard and his team provide a wide range of standard X-ray inspection systems to cater for hundreds of different products in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetics industries.
